So i read the latest ILPS statement on Tibet, written by none other than the dearest Chairman himself, Joma Sison. As a "deactivated" activist who used to be so gung-ho with ND organizations, i'm so appalled how off his analysis is.  The first line goes like this: The movement represented by the Dalai Lama is utterly reactionary... ( read further here). Reaction is supposed to be the opposite of Revolution, and China is anything but revolutionary. I'm surprised how this senile schmuck could've been so off lately, hmm i guess dozing off a lot these days have eaten his maoist magic away. fortunately i'm not alone for i found this blog (writen by someone still active on the radical left of center) who's bright enough not to drink the koolaid. So I wish upon the red star that pinoy activists who believe the BS faster than China could say to the Dalai Lama: All your dreams are dead, would consider. After all, the movement is not a cult, it's a movement...or is it??? tantadada!for culture, language and religion, still is a struggle. Free Tibet!
Comment deleted at the request of the author.
 |  So i read the latest ILPS statement on Tibet, written by none other than the dearest Chairman himself, Joma Sison. As a "deactivated" activist who used to be so gung-ho with ND organizations, i'm so appalled how off his analysis is.
The first line goes like this: The movement represented by the Dalai Lama is utterly reactionary... (read further here). Reaction is supposed to be the opposite of Revolution, and China is anything but revolutionary. I'm surprised how this senile schmuck could've been so off lately, hmm i guess dozing off a lot these days have eaten his maoist magic away. fortunately i'm not alone for i found this blog (writen by someone still active on the radical left of center) who's bright enough not to drink the koolaid. So I wish upon the red star that pinoy activists who believe the BS faster than China could say to the Dalai Lama: All your dreams are dead, would consider. After all, the movement is not a cult, it's a movement...or is it??? tantadada!
for culture, language and religion, still is a struggle.
Free Tibet!
 "senile smuck"? be careful with your choice of words, I hope you have enough basis to cover that.
Just FYI, the ILPS statement is NOT AN INDIVIDUAL OPINION, have you an idea how many mass organizations all over the world ILPS represents? The statement is a result of a consensus perspective that included ANSWER, IAC, etc. etc.
Maybe you ought to do some research yourself on the matter rather than "reacting" to a particular statement, of an international alliance that is, NOT AN INDIVIDUAL.
"No investigation, no right to speak".
Since you blogged this publicly, I hope you don't mind me forwarding it to the ILPS? |
 | Now this is SO pathetic.
I never imagined you can get this low.
hmmm, i guess you're the one dozing off a lot these days, eh? |
| Tell that to yourself, dear. &;p |
| Ahaha. Isa pa 'tong sensitive. Hay jusko. Get some fresh air, mah dear. &;p |
 | don't worry i get a lot of fresh air these days, since i travel around the potomac area everyday. nothing beats the virginia suburbs + a cigarette stick. |
 | Let a thousand flowers bloom. continue the debate. But make arguments grounded and substantial. Don't bite each other's ear off. Then we'll see how far we can go. Looking forward to 'reading' your thoughts. :-) |
| Haha! Ok, sige sabi mo eh. And I hope that clears your head and stop (or at least try to lessen) calling people names, whether it be the "senile shmuck" you're talking about or the next cranky guy in the deli who'll sell you those cigarettes. And if you want to debate about this, do it upfront with the one you're calling "senile shmuck". I'm sure he'll be glad to accomodate you. |
| Oh sorry, that was "schmuck" pala, with a "c". Sorry ha, 'di kasi ako perfect. Ahaha. |
Comment deleted at the request of the author.
| arsikoi wrote on Apr 23, edited on Apr 23 Haha! Ok, sige sabi mo eh. And I hope that clears your head and stop (or at least try to lessen) calling people names, whether it be the "senile shmuck" you're talking about or the next cranky guy in the deli who'll sell you those cigarettes. And if you want to debate about this, do it upfront with the one you're calling "senile shmuck". I'm sure he'll be glad to accomodate you. look we can call gloria and cohorts the most outrageous epithets ever (murder, bitch, fascist, genociderist?, etc.), and we don't even blink for a sec even if those name callings and accusations can be downright slanderous. so do bush and even the bourgeois icons of the world get to be described with the most unflattering adjectives, but the world doesn't flinch every time it happens. im not defending the evildoers nor would i get myself into an ACLU type of freedom of speech defense. but the gist of this whole thing, is something important which should be more discussed.
im not apologetic for the type of language used here to make a statement, since the old guy is a public figure, he has been called exponentially worse names, secondly and i hate to point this out, it's actually called sarcastic humour and thirdly, the very reason why i utilized this type of humor is to prove that he is not infallible/untouchable/omnipotent and for people to react on the bait with those buzzwords only proves my point how we need to reform some of our attitudes toward our leadership.
dont drink the kool-aid. |
| Sorry, dear. But I don't really drink koolaid in the first place. I only drink water. Ahaha. &;p "look we can call gloria and cohorts the most outrageous epithets ever (murder, bitch, fascist, genociderist?, etc.), and we don't even blink for a sec even if those name callings and accusations can be downright slanderous. so do bush and even the bourgeois icons of the world get to be described with the most unflattering adjectives, but the world doesn't flinch every time it happens." What else are you supposed to call them when they're exactly just what they're being called? The world doesn't flinch because IT IS TRUE. Can you prove otherwise? And to call Joma as a "senile schmuck", I echo Kuya Gary. "No investigation, no right to speak." Sorry but I honestly find your statement -- if you can even call that a "statement" -- very cowardly. I really hope you see the big difference between these two. im not apologetic for the type of language used here to make a statement, since the old guy is a public figure, he has been called exponentially worse names Oh yah? At least, I think not by supposed "kasamas". secondly and i hate to point this out, it's actually called sarcastic humour Don't worry, dear. I thought so, too. thirdly, the very reason why i utilized this type of humor is to prove that he is not infallible/untouchable/omnipotent and for people to react on the bait with those buzzwords only proves my point how we need to reform some of our attitudes toward our leadership. Again, as Kuya Gary said, point very well taken, dear. And I hope it starts with you. And I'm sure you know very well what we mean. &;p |
| arsikoi wrote on Apr 24, edited on Apr 24 Point very well taken, I agree someone needs to reform their attitudes.
Someone really need it badly.
Someone also just needs to come out already. the more of the same condescending innuendos, just the kind of bitterness that usually ooze out from ur tiny heads. your audacity never cease to amaze me. |
| arsikoi wrote on Apr 24, edited on Apr 24 point very well taken, dear. there you go, you're all fired up now. well of course as always. the fanciful world u live in thrives in a constant double speak. to acknowledge the humorous tone albeit sarcastically while complaining that it isn't a "statement" and done "very cowardly" is double speak. you don't think twice how hurtful or truthful every accusations you throw out to your enemies. and as ive said im not defending evildoers just analyzing introspectively if we're fair game. you raise a red flag and hell break loose even though senile nor schmuck doesn't add up anything substantial as an "accusative" statement but a mere wordplay of a conjured scenario (...of him dozing off). so if you guys think that more of the same maoist rhetoric works on me ( ...no right to speak?)...your very very wrong.
And if "kasamas" would rather object to a bunch of adjectives rather than talk about the real issue of my STATEMENT: his wrong stance on tibet.
"point very well taken"??? ...NOT. |
| there you go, you're all fired up now. Haha. 'Yun naman ang gusto mo, di ba? E 'di pagbigyan. &;p well of course as always. the fanciful world u live in thrives in a constant double speak. to acknowledge the humorous tone albeit sarcastically while complaining that it isn't a "statement" and done "very cowardly" is double speak. you don't think twice how hurtful or truthful every accusations you throw out to your enemies. and as ive said im not defending evildoers just analyzing introspectively if we're fair game. you raise a red flag and hell break loose even though senile nor schmuck doesn't add up anything substantial as an "accusative" statement but a mere wordplay of a conjured scenario (...of him dozing off). so if you guys think that more of the same maoist rhetoric works on me ( ...no right to speak?)...your very very wrong. Now, that's sensitive. Sorry pero natatawa na lang talaga ako. Papansin ka masyado e noh. Pansin mo 'yon? &;p And if "kasamas" would rather object to a bunch of adjectives rather than talk about the real issue of my STATEMENT: his wrong stance on tibet. That's because I don't find anything wrong with the "ILPS" statement. If anything, it's actually sharp. And excuse me but if you look at your "statement", it doesn't actually say anything. Did you even try to point out what was wrong with the statement? NO. Instead, you proceeded with the name-calling without even really saying what you think is wrong with the statement. So I don't really consider it a "statement" but just a mere "reaction". Again, sorry but I believe Kuya Gary had a point. "point very well taken"??? ...NOT. Kami, resolbado kami. Ewan ko lang ikaw. |
| Papansin ka masyado e noh.
bat mo pinapansin? last time i check this is still my blog. last time i check i didn't beg anyone to comment. you're conduit to that statement. kung walang pumapansin sa nagpapansin, wala sanang napapansin. but no, you can't help yourselves.
That's because I don't find anything wrong with the "ILPS" statement
and thats exactly why i made this statement. pansin mo rin yon? as i've said, don't drink the kool-aid.
Kami, resolbado kami. Ewan ko lang ikaw.
ummm yeah very predictable, with your tiny meetings and whatnot. resolbado..di resolbado. do i look like i give a f...? |
| bat mo pinapansin? last time i check this is still my blog. last time i check i didn't beg anyone to comment. you're conduit to that statement. kung walang pumapansin sa nagpapansin, wala sanang napapansin. but no, you can't help yourselves. Oh shux, thanks for the reminder. O nga pala, blog mo nga pala 'to. Sorry ha, kulot kasi ako. Haha. That's because I don't find anything wrong with the "ILPS" statement
and thats exactly why i made this statement. pansin mo rin yon? as i've said, don't drink the kool-aid. Hindi nga kasi ako umiinom ng kool-aid. Haha. ummm yeah very predictable, with your tiny meetings and whatnot. resolbado..di resolbado. do i look like i give a f...? Oh yah. You don't give a f... Kaya ka nga umalis, di ba? &;p |
| bat mo pinapansin? last time i check this is still my blog. last time i check i didn't beg anyone to comment. you're conduit to that statement. kung walang pumapansin sa nagpapansin, wala sanang napapansin. but no, you can't help yourselves. Sorry, hindi ako satisfied sa naunang sagot ko. For that, sasagot ako ulit. Anyway, ang gusto ko lang naman sabihin, sana ginawa mo na lang private ang blog entry mo na 'to kung ayaw mo naman palang may papansin. Haha. Enjoy! &;p |
| arsikoi wrote on Apr 24, edited on Apr 24 im not religious nor am i sure if i believe in god but there's a wonderful biblical passage in response to that:
"Now no one after lighting a lamp covers it over with a container, or puts it under a bed; but he puts it on a lampstand, so that those who come in may see the light" Luke 8:16
i say its fair game after all, i too was once a preacher...of the gospels of grassroots politics. |
| im not religious nor am i sure if i believe in god but there's a wonderful biblical passage in response to that:
"Now no one after lighting a lamp covers it over with a container, or puts it under a bed; but he puts it on a lampstand, so that those who come in may see the light" Luke 8:16
i say its fair game after all, i too was once a preacher...of the gospels of grassroots politics. And I quote: "32 Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common.
33With great power the apostles gave their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace was upon them all.
34There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold.
35They laid it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need."
Acts 4:32-37 Even the Bible teaches of the same principle as we believe. i say its fair game after all, i too was once a preacher...of the gospels of grassroots politics. Are you still? Seems to me like you've lost all your principles with everything you have said in this thread. Sad to say, but it shows. |
| arsikoi wrote on Apr 25, edited on Apr 25 you've lost all your principles whoa your bible quote is too long, it gave me a momentary brain fart. anyway i know what your saying here: collectivism, socialism, social class solidarity, same stuff. of course you can find anything in the bible, why even muslims can open up a bible and find something islamic on it...and even communists love to claim jesus as one of their commrades. but the same bible espouses these "principles" side by side with the one you quoted: killing those who disobey parents (Proverbs 20:20; Leviticus 20:9; Exodus 21:15), death in disbelief in god (2 Chronicles 15:12-13; Deuteronomy 13:13-19), upholding slavery (Ephesians 6:5; Exodus 21:2-6) oppression of women (Exodus 21:20-21; Deuteronomy 22:20-21), homophobia (Leviticus 20:13; Romans 1:24-32), genocide ((Jeremiah 51:20-26) and many others. So think twice in dissecting quotes without considering context, after all its just another literary work for believers of woo-woo.
if you mean YOUR principles yes. but you don't hold monopoly to principles nor define as what the ultimate correct one is. unless you swear to yours as the absolute one and only path to human salvation. if you do so, there is no need for debate or this lengthy exchange, for you will only thrive by means of preaching.
|
| whoa your bible quote is too long, it gave me a momentary brain fart. anyway i know what your saying here: collectivism, socialism, social class solidarity, same stuff. of course you can find anything in the bible, why even muslims can open up a bible and find something islamic on it...and even communists love to claim jesus as one of their commrades. but the same bible espouses these "principles" side by side with the one you quoted: killing those who disobey parents (Proverbs 20:20; Leviticus 20:9; Exodus 21:15), death in disbelief in god (2 Chronicles 15:12-13; Deuteronomy 13:13-19), upholding slavery (Ephesians 6:5; Exodus 21:2-6) oppression of women (Exodus 21:20-21; Deuteronomy 22:20-21), homophobia (Leviticus 20:13; Romans 1:24-32), genocide ((Jeremiah 51:20-26) and many others. So think twice in dissecting quotes without considering context, after all its just another literary work for believers of woo-woo. E tungaw ka pala talaga eh. Sinagot ko lang 'yung quote mo. Haha! Atsaka please lang noh, mas nakakautot kaya 'yung mga biblical references na binigay mo. Biruin mo 'yun, ganun ka pala ka-hayok sa Bibliya na alam mo lahat kung nasaang book, verse at chapter 'yung mga topics na 'yun. Sino kaya ang mapagpanggap sa 'ten? Haha! if you mean YOUR principles yes. but you don't hold monopoly to principles nor define as what the ultimate correct one is. unless you swear to yours as the absolute one and only path to human salvation. if you do so, there is no need for debate or this lengthy exchange, for you will only thrive by means of preaching. Eh magaling ka nga kasi kaya hindi mo na kailangan ng debate. Haha! Kaya nga nag-resort ka na sa name-calling eh kasi feeling ko (feeling ko lang naman), TAKOT ka lang din makipag-debate dun sa tinawag mong "senile schmuck" dahil alam mong mas matino at aktibo pang gumagana ang utak n'on kesa sa 'yo. Hahahaha! Ang sabihin mo, talo ka na sa debateng 'to at ayaw mo pang aminin dahil masyado kang ma-pride na tao. Hay jusko, arcy. Get a life! &;p |
| So ano? Naabot mo ba 'yung target number of comments na inaasam mo? Ayan oh, may 29 comments na 'tong blog entry mo. Plus one pa 'tong comment na 'to, e 'di 30 na. Masaya ka na ba nang lagay na 'yan? &;p |
| arsikoi wrote on Apr 25, edited on Apr 25 E tungaw ka pala talaga eh. luckily this is a public blog. Jonna, feel free to blow up on me and lose your academic finesse and more so your rigid political correctness. after all, i stirred an issue using the most politically incorrect language. Over time, I expected you to do so anyway, and that time is now. As for the bible quotation, i repeat my disclaimer which you've deliberately overlooked, and i quote:
"im not religious nor am i sure if i believe in god but there's a wonderful biblical passage in response to that"
Unlike you, i disclaim and removed myself from the original religious context of the passage and used it only as a response from your earlier contention using the quotation's naked value. Have you read the passages before and after Acts 4:32-35? I guess not, cause you are ignorant of it's context. That passage you quoted do not refer to socialism and/or proletarian collectivity, which you are trying to imply. So yeah, "tungaw" ako no?
"eh kasi feeling ko (feeling ko lang naman) TAKOT ka lang din makipag-debate dun sa tinawag mong "senile schmuck"" - Jonna
Go ahead you can taunt me, after all you've been doing that all your activist life. As for a challenge of a debate, bring it on. But i'm not lifting my butt an inch off just to find the avenue to debate your most high glorious leader in exile. if you're so suggesting a debate, why don't you make the bridge? Be proactive don't just whine like a sore loser.
"So ano? Naabot mo ba 'yung target number of comments na inaasam mo? Ayan oh, may 29 comments na 'tong blog entry mo. Plus one pa 'tong comment na 'to, e 'di 30 na. Masaya ka na ba nang lagay na 'yan?" - Jonna
Last time i said, and i'm hating myself for repeating again and again to an intellectual person like you: "last time i check i didn't beg anyone to comment." If you so hate it here, why are you so active in making comments? 13 out of 30 comments or roughly more than 1/3. geee thanks jonna, suki ka talaga sa pagpaparami ko ng comment dito 'no? maraming salamat sa pagpapaligaya mo sa araw ko? Masaya ka na ba nang lagay na 'yan?
Jonna lay off the kool-aid, you have too much of it. |
Comment deleted at the request of the author.
| luckily this is a public blog. Jonna, feel free to blow up on me and lose your academic finesse and more so your rigid political correctness. after all, i stirred an issue using the most politically incorrect language. Over time, I expected you to do so anyway, and that time is now. As for the bible quotation, i repeat my disclaimer which you've deliberately overlooked, and i quote:
"im not religious nor am i sure if i believe in god but there's a wonderful biblical passage in response to that"
Unlike you, i disclaim and removed myself from the original religious context of the passage and used it only as a response from your earlier contention using the quotation's naked value. Have you read the passages before and after Acts 4:32-35? I guess not, cause you are ignorant of it's context. That passage you quoted do not refer to socialism and/or proletarian collectivity, which you are trying to imply. So yeah, "tungaw" ako no? Haha! I have nothing to lose anyway, arcy. In the first place, I don't think highly of myself na kesyo nakapag-aral ako eh ipapangangalandakan ko na (except for now, I guess, dahil pinoprovoke mo 'ko. Haha!) Naniniwala pa rin kasi ako sa praxis. Hindi ako hanggang teorya, debate at puro salita lang (at least, that's what I'd like to think. You can also ask other people about my work ethics if you want. Hindi lang kasi s'ya nakikita sa diskusyunang tulad nito.) &;p About the bible quote, ignorante naman kasi talaga ako sa Bibliya. Kinuha ko lang 'yan sa pinsan ko kasi nga, hindi naman ako religious. Hahaha! Atsaka haller, may sinabi ba akong nagre-refer s'ya sa socialism and/or proletarian collectivity? Assuming ka masyado ah. Haha! Ang sabi ko lang, "even the Bible teaches of the same principle as we believe". Eh malay mo ba kung anong principle 'yun? Eh kung sabihin kong hindi naman socialism 'yun ar proletarian collectivity 'yung principle na sinasabi ko? Hahahaha! Go ahead you can taunt me, after all you've been doing that all your activist life. Haller??? Kelan lang ba kita nakilala??? Haha! Tibak na kaya ako bago pa kita nakilala! Duh! Tsaka haller, ngayon lang kaya kita pinag-aksayahan ng panahon! Hahahahahaha! Feeling ka naman masyado. As for a challenge of a debate, bring it on. But i'm not lifting my butt an inch off just to find the avenue to debate your most high glorious leader in exile. if you're so suggesting a debate, why don't you make the bridge? Be proactive don't just whine like a sore loser. There you go. That only proves na duwag ka nga talaga. Ba't kailangan mo pa ng bridge? Mukha ba 'kong tulay? Haha! Sino kaya ang loser sa atin? Hindi ko na sasagutin 'yang tanong na 'yan. Hahayaan ko na lang 'yung mga makakabasa na mag-judge. After all, I'm not a book. Ahahahaha! &;p Last time i said, and i'm hating myself for repeating again and again to an intellectual person like you: "last time i check i didn't beg anyone to comment." If you so hate it here, why are you so active in making comments? 13 out of 30 comments or roughly more than 1/3. geee thanks jonna, suki ka talaga sa pagpaparami ko ng comment dito 'no? maraming salamat sa pagpapaligaya mo sa araw ko? Masaya ka na ba nang lagay na 'yan? Sabi ko nga, sori naman kasi I don't treat myself as an intellectual. Haha! Atsaka haller, sinabi ko bang i hate it here? Super enjoy kaya akong mag-comment nang mag-comment! Happy ako, promise. Az in! &;p Jonna lay off the kool-aid, you have too much of it. Ilang beses ko bang sasabihin na hindi nga ako umiinom ng kool-aid??? Ni hindi ko nga alam kung anong mga flavors meron ang kool-aid eh. Hahaha! &;p |
| That only proves na duwag ka nga talaga. jonna, i know youre just doing your job in engaging me. These things are clearly stated in the docu's of araling tibak that commands you to engage and disprove bloody "liberal propaganda" against the movement. As any exchange of rebuttals, it can be bloody, tough, down and dirty. Kahit gaano ka politically grounded, ang tao'y napupuno at magagalit rin. I just hope you develop a higher level of immunity from my "liberal poison" and not be fuming mad. after all, ika nga "ang pikon ay talo".
also for the love of jesus and all those god damn saints, if i had a nickel every time you call me "duwag" i would've been rich by now. didn't you originally floated the idea of a debate with your old man? plus if i have to debate every demigod i disagree and bash, i would've fallen inline a long time ago just to debate pres. GW bush, the pope, folks from NAMBLA, rosie o'donell, and that witch ann coulter. as i said: be a proactive bridge.
thanks for the joy of commenting here, welcome to the dark side. *insert evil laugh* |
| jonna, i know youre just doing your job in engaging me. These things are clearly stated in the docu's of araling tibak that commands you to engage and disprove bloody "liberal propaganda" against the movement. As any exchange of rebuttals, it can be bloody, tough, down and dirty. Oh yeh. Buti alam mo pa 'yan. Matandain ka rin pala. &;p Kahit gaano ka politically grounded, ang tao'y napupuno at magagalit rin. I just hope you develop a higher level of immunity from my "liberal poison" and not be fuming mad. after all, ika nga "ang pikon ay talo". Haha! Ako pa mapipikon? Sa 'yo? Haller? Kung pikon ako, e 'di sana, matagal ko nang tinigilan ang sumagot dito sa blog entry mo. Baka ikaw ang napipikon? Kasi hanggang ngayon, ayaw pa rin kitang tantanan. Haha! &;p also for the love of jesus and all those god damn saints, if i had a nickel every time you call me "duwag" i would've been rich by now. Duwag. Duwag. Duwag. Duwag. 20 cents na 'yan. Hehe. Kaso wala ka pa rin yatang nickel. Tsk tsk. Pano ba 'yan? E 'di hindi ka pa rin mayaman. Ehehe. didn't you originally floated the idea of a debate with your old man? plus if i have to debate every demigod i disagree and bash, i would've fallen inline a long time ago just to debate pres. GW bush, the pope, folks from NAMBLA, rosie o'donell, and that witch ann coulter. Another nickel for you! Haha! Tsk. Ba't nga kaya hindi mo pa ginawa 'yon? Hmmm. More nickels please! Dimes, gusto mo? What if quarters kaya para naman malaki-laki ang value? &;p as i said: be a proactive bridge. Haha! Ang galing mo talaga mag-divert noh? Para kang si GMA. 'Di bale, napasabihan na naman si "old man" eh. One of these days, baka bumisita 'yun dito sa blog mo. Marami lang kasing inaasikaso. 'Di tulad mo, nagpapainit lang ng puwet sa lungga. &;p thanks for the joy of commenting here, welcome to the dark side. *insert evil laugh* My pleasure. *insert chipmunk song. Then fade out.* &;p |
| arsikoi wrote on Apr 28, edited on Apr 28 Hahayaan ko na lang 'yung mga makakabasa na mag-judge. ...and i quoted your prior comment in response to your latest one.
(word of advice for your sanity: open mouth insert your foot) |
| ...and i quoted your prior comment in response to your latest one. Oooohhhh... I'm afraid... very afraid! Hahahahaha! Thanks for quoting me, by the way. Daming beses mo ring ginawa 'yun ah. I feel so honored. Grabe. &;p (word of advice for your sanity: open mouth insert your foot) Thanks! 'Di mo ba alam, talent ko 'yan? Sarap nga eh, gusto mo tikman? &;p |
| arsikoi wrote on Apr 28, edited on Apr 28 You say: "Sorry pero natatawa na lang talaga ako. Papansin ka masyado e noh. Pansin mo 'yon? &;p"
and then later you say: "...Kasi hanggang ngayon, ayaw pa rin kitang tantanan. Haha! &;p"
you say: "Duwag. Duwag. Duwag. Duwag. "
but before that you say: "...stop (or at least try to lessen) calling people names, whether it be the "senile shmuck" you're talking about..."
you say: "'Di mo ba alam, talent ko 'yan?"
but the only talent you got is the in knack for double speak. while i read and reread your comments from top to bottom, you defy the natural process of thought evolution. instead your recent responses have devolved from a perfectly normal exchange into idiotic rants. if your trying to be an a-hole as much as you can be with exponentially idiotic comments by the day, because you're too fired up with this (despite of your blatant denial that your not "pikon" with these exchanges, even if you've reached the boiling point a long long time ago) , go ahead take the risk.
in the meantime, habang ako'y nagpapainit ng pwet sa lungga, im enjoying the view of someone like you whos devolving and dismantling yourself by the minute from a high and mighty always politically correct pretentious im-doing-something-in-praxis-and-your-not joma sison mouth piece into something less of a pretty annoyed *****.
|
| Hahahahahahahahahaha!
Isa pa...
Hahahahahahahahahaha!
Grabe, napikon ako! Sobra!
&;p |
| Ayan, sige na nga, titigil na 'ko. Pikon kasi ako eh. Hahahahaha! &;p
Oh and yah, by the way. I'm really an a-hole and I'm a *****. Hindi ba obvious? Like, duh? Ano pa bang silbi ko sa buhay? &;p |
| arsikoi wrote on Apr 28, edited on Apr 28 Ayan, sige na nga, titigil na 'ko. Pikon kasi ako eh. Hahahahaha! &;p
Oh and yah, by the way. I'm really an a-hole and I'm a *****. Hindi ba obvious? Like, duh? Ano pa bang silbi ko sa buhay? &;p *applause mode* oh i love it 'till the last word of it as this information will be useful for the next 20 years of your activist career. you just prolly summed up the totality of your existential purpose. as for simulating too much "hahahas", no jonna, that hasn't 'watered down' the fact that you still blew over your top... (a.k.a na-pi-kon). but kudos to you, with kind of entertainment you provide, it's better than jumping white tigers and fire eating freaks at a cirque du soleil and i'll never look back at blogging the same way again. ay por vida, akin pala ang huling halakhak, bwahahahaha! |
| It's been my honor to make you happy & entertained, dear. I'm sure you will never forget me. &;p |
| arsikoi wrote on Apr 30, edited on Apr 30 wow. thats actually great news. i wonder when the philippine version can happen. |
 | totally enjoyed the debate! sorry, that's all i can contribute...
reading the whole thing at these wee hours. :)) |
| hahaha! no koment na lang ko bai para linaw. XD |
| arsi, akoy gikapoy og basa sa inyong paglantugi hehehe gihangak ko! |
| when man ka mouli? naa pa ko sa netherlands ron pero basin pa diay mag abot ta. :-) |
| hapit na jud kaayo. mamilok na lang ta. |
| |
